Our messege for Judges and the Courts
As I am sure you are aware, there are major problems within the industry of purchasing Structured Settlement payments by factoring companies. My partner and I have witnessed the massive profits, manipulative tactics, and in some cases illegal methods used within the Structured Settlement purchasing industry at the expense of Policy Holders throughout the United States, and we know how to eliminate it for good finally, while also bringing a higher sense of certainty to Judges who are approving/denying these cases.
Due to the recent years of corruptness and shady activities within the structured settlement purchasing industry, the pressure to approve or deny a deal has greatly increased for judges. There have recently been some cases where Judges have even been sued due to approving transfers where the policy holders were extremely short-changed and taken advantage of by the settlement company.
Your primary role in these cases is to make sure the transaction is in the best interest of the seller relating to use of the funds, competency, prior records/deals, interest rate etc. BUT there is no way for you to know from a numbers standpoint if the transaction is in the best interest UNLESS there is industry knowledge, you know to who and how the annuities are sold, you have the calculation systems, and many other factors that go into pricing a fair deal.
Understand, we are not saying that we are qualified to decide whether or not the final order be Approved or Denied, because that is clearly the role of the Judge assigned to the case within the judicial process. We don't even recommend that policy holders sell payments, however it is going to happen. With that said, we can ensure that policy holders always receive maximum value when pursuing a payment transfer.
Our messege for Judges and the Courts
As I am sure you are aware, there are major problems within the industry of purchasing Structured Settlement payments by factoring companies. My partner and I have witnessed the massive profits, manipulative tactics, and in some cases illegal methods used within the Structured Settlement purchasing industry at the expense of Policy Holders throughout the United States, and we know how to eliminate it for good finally, while also bringing a higher sense of certainty to Judges who are approving/denying these cases.
Due to the recent years of corruptness and shady activities within the structured settlement purchasing industry, the pressure to approve or deny a deal has greatly increased for judges. There have recently been some cases where Judges have even been sued due to approving transfers where the policy holders were extremely short-changed and taken advantage of by the settlement company.
Your primary role in these cases is to make sure the transaction is in the best interest of the seller relating to use of the funds, competency, prior records/deals, interest rate etc. BUT there is no way for you to know from a numbers standpoint if the transaction is in the best interest UNLESS there is industry knowledge, you know to who and how the annuities are sold, you have the calculation systems, and many other factors that go into pricing a fair deal.
Understand, we are not saying that we are qualified to decide whether or not the final order be Approved or Denied, because that is clearly the role of the Judge assigned to the case within the judicial process. We don't even recommend that policy holders sell payments, however it is going to happen. With that said, we can ensure that policy holders always receive maximum value when pursuing a payment transfer.